Search for: "Jacob Parker"
Results 1 - 20
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2008, 10:19 am
January 30, 2008) (Jacobs, Parker, Wesley, CJJ) (per curiam)Schlesinger, convicted of mail and wire fraud, made a clever, but unfortunately not clever enough, argument challenging the forfeiture of the proceeds.The district court had relied on 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:41 am
June 26, 2012) (Jacobs, Parker, Hall, CJJ) Defendant Skhar was convicted of Hobbs Act extortion and the interstate transmission of extortionate threats based on a particularly bizarre set of facts. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:51 am
Parker? [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 10:16 am
January 30, 2008) (Jacobs, Parker, Wesley, CJJ) (per curiam)Here, the court holds that a failure to make a claim under the Speedy Trial Act in the district court results in a waiver of the issue on appeal. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
From Jacob Gershman (Wall Street Journal Law Blog): Janice Evans, a city spokeswoman, told Law Blog in a statement: Mayor Parker agrees with those who are concerned about the city legal department’s subpoenas for pastor’s sermons. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:35 am
Nov. 30, 2006) (Jacobs, Parker, Oberdorfer) (per curiam): This short opinion holds that convictions under (1) the second clause of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 5:51 am
December 14, 2010) (Jacobs, Pooler, Parker, CJJ)In United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 2:24 pm
October 19, 2009) (Jacobs, McLaughlin, Parker, CJJ)Here, the circuit held that the admission of defendant McCallum’s two prior drug convictions - which it termed “propensity evidence in sheep’s clothing” - during his federal crack trafficking trial was an abuse of discretion. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 11:26 am
October 6, 2008) (Jacobs, Parker, Hall, CJJ)Here, the improper admission of "officer expert" testimony resulted in a new trial.BackgroundThe defendants were convicted of participating in two drive-by shootings in connection with their membership in the MS-13 gang. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:06 pm
Parker: Mike Mansfield. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:37 pm
There was a lot of extra money handed out to incentivize people to get the spinoff from Time Warner done, so we’ll see if Jacobs does as well as Parker did. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm
Yes, because the yellow cabs and the Uber cars are not "similarly-situated," meaning the government can treat them differently.The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Sack and Parker) details how the yellow cabs differ from the Uber cars. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:38 pm
. - Colas Construction Ben Duncan - Multnomah County Health Equity Initiative Brian Emerick - Portland Historic Landmarks Commission Jessica Engelmann - Oregon Walks Jason Franklin - Portland State University Jeanne Galick - Willamette greenway advocate, South Portland resident Jim Gardner - South Portland Neighborhood Association Patricia Gardner - Pearl District Neighborhood Association Greg Goodman - Downtown Development Group Patrick Gortmaker - Old Town/Chinatown Community Association Jodi… [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:57 am
Johnstone sued the Mayor and the Village for a racially hostile work environment.The district court says Johnstone cannot win the case, and the Court of Appeals (Parker, Jacobs and Walker) agrees. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
” Judge Parker asked. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:48 am
We call this the Central Hudson doctrine.The Second Circuit (Parker, Restani [sitting by designation] and Jacobs [who dissents]) starts off by holding the law does in fact regulate speech-related conduct, as day-laborers looking for work are soliciting employment; that expresses a message. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 7:26 am
Barbara Jacobs in charge of outreach. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 3:00 am
According to the report, Raymond Parker was serving on a grand jury when it voted to return a true bill of indictment against him for assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 3:00 am
According to the report, Raymond Parker was serving on a grand jury when it voted to return a true bill of indictment against him for assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:50 am
Here's how the Second Circuit (Jacobs, Parker and Chin) writes it up:MacLeod concedes that “the seriousness of his crimes prior to the use of force was not trivial[,]” but he nonetheless claims that the use of force was unreasonable because he had “voluntarily ceased his criminal conduct and was attempting to surrender at the time he was tased[.] [read post]
